No. 22-5377
Malik Breyon Hollis v. Matthew Magnusson, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection jury-composition jury-selection peremptory-challenges racial-discrimination
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether peremptory challenges of racial minorities during jury selection in criminal trials should be subjected to a heightened judicial inquiry of strict scrutiny.
Whether peremptory challenges in the jury selection process should be eliminated altogether.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether peremptory challenges of racial minorities during jury selection in criminal trials should be subjected to a heightened judicial inquiry of strict scrutiny
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-17
Waiver of right of respondent Maine to respond filed.
2022-07-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 16, 2022)
Attorneys
Maine
Donald William Macomber — Maine Office of Atty. Gen., Respondent
Malik Hollis
James Paul Howaniec — Howaniec Law Offices, Petitioner