No. 22-5371
Darrell Harris v. Robert Hudgins, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: collateral-estoppel federal-court federal-offense federal-prosecution issue-preclusion res-judicata sixth-amendment speedy-trial
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-10-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER PRINCIPLES OF "RES JUDICATA" TRIGGERED APPLI
CATION OF ISSUE PRECLUSION AND COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL SO AS
TO DEPRIVE THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUTHORITY TO CHARGE THE
PETITIONER WITH A FEDERAL OFFENSE BASED ON THE SAME FACTS
USED IN A PRIOR STATE PROCEEDINGS BUT WHICH WAS DISMISSED
BECAUSE OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENT'S "SPEEDY TRIAL" CLAUSE?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether principles of res judicata triggered application of issue preclusion and collateral estoppel
Docket Entries
2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-09-16
Waiver of right of respondent Hudgins, Robert to respond filed.
2022-07-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 16, 2022)
Attorneys
Darrell Harris
Darrell Lamont Harris — Petitioner
Hudgins, Robert
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent