The facts, issues, and eudeace relates to Lace A Juvenile Lifec*s DecertiFitarion(Jrunstec) deescrou ace celévaatto Said Juvenile Likees re sentencing, The decectFicateon CTroasfe-\decsron preseuts the seaten emg Op tion a ightseatence aS4a Tuveatle gud extcemely long Sentence as an adult, ule ay 7 tong See, MIE r v, Alabama /32 Ket 2455 (20/0); Alleyne vy We$.,/33 Set. 2s (013). Com, vs Munday 78 43d bbl (Pa. Supe o, RO/3),

I, Dees the Fact that at Juvenile Life es RESéintencingin 28, fhe Ju age Pécanted the only reason he €laim €d whe dhenred Decectifying Sard Tuvenile Lifer Pet toner fp duvenle system an /992. Make any Seatence and Coavictyon on Sard Charges #n adult Criminal system UAconsh tutional null and Vora oe reece 7

Ai Did Court ercfabuse dicretcon by Sentencing Petitioner tO aman, Festly Ex COSsiVe unven Sonal le, and bias 40 years fe Lfe, Resttutionaud Cos+ of Proseuation ignoring EX Post Facto laws, Sentencing Petitions baseg 7 On Consideration of First degree Mucded Not second degree murdes and agtec Re SRA TEAC S an alleged 9 co-defendant to Qo to SoVeucs tT ee ce te eee

3.Pid Courtect/abuse discretion by relyngon False, Mislead NG, aad haccurute mn formaten to decide Sentmce?., [9

4.Did court er fabuse discretion by Aot reglacing petitionel'S unethical Couct apponte d attorney (Robert Barbato) Who was blatantly Working With prosecatoa agumst petitinnec(his own chenthatevery Stage //ssue of case bo Sabotage case Pe foe bb be Oey XO

S. Did cour} Crv/abuse diserehon by \yhoring petitionec's Possibje and/or Actual Rehabilitative needs Mcludmng, but not lmmited +o mental health rehe bil tatrow 2, Co ee cere RM

6, Dike Cour} errabuse Aj - oa or hune ed 6 0F edges o% ce ricnt pion vA (gnorins the as exhibits to Petitmnec's Bret her en the Wort ation (A pre -Seateace report weet that ZA Formatinn Packet Prose wtida's Seaterce. veaile LiFe c Pefondant's Seat : "tence Me morun dui port is False, misleading and inacc LD atren Aor Cou . F; / eraser, on bEgtegps ay abdressn lu TFET abuse discretvn by - . ReSena}, 9 atuse of

Whether the juvenile life-without-parole sentence is unconstitutional, whether the court abused discretion in sentencing, whether the court relied on false/misleading information, whether the court ignored rehabilitation needs, whether the court prohibited presentation of evidence, whether the evidence supported the conviction and sentence, whether the court's findings on the actual shooter were false, whether the Miller v. Alabama juvenile sentencing requirements are unconstitutional