if ame^tleyl <£i/^r Gvudc-T -a Jk^encfoui tUui* r an
fFHciregj o-r i wc^'wiploTle Le^s^.
fl*£fx r wial v 1/ (xl
do-eAfVclujd^/ cJv&ytj e_ Uik
urn chcd ^fl_re^G^©(>ry agrees hasUugIij
>vc' S^w '^r &un&it U4 0A OAuani_ ■falTircTTart
wuttsr** W rt4TrWTi/aMy a^re^ VTtT av^ tT7.s also
W«A
C|nfl.5iL(7rj , o£-^eaT~pu^(,c TTv.p^-rTcmc^ (GvdT/t^of
Srcvv\s(y SlTj^ ,or
A^iV'vw^d
Cn
(2>*bTt?o{c\). ^ur t2i,7S>3<] W-50.
■ Gu^rT^-s) cS^-dan^ ftAA/oitc/^^tta-
"FecU^J w OSes 3 t °lis~(h) m) cuvd iW -f Uriels
ftpptAlcJt. pYc-e^d) — 'Tte. Cydir r&vubrec( fey
^30fi2i)CB) ?ure_
5* ^ 3F ^-^ndcmi^/ctf To <3^vu/icf <V j^ '/^douf U/noUr" <^\
TV-* ^(W^cwCT Qrre^T ft££tdemtT~' culinary Tc Ttcyf <tO
-Srsfuii; Gvtpffeio SSCoJl.
64,'ficfrovvfc. (vuuuT^T^Vl 1\i\)&£Uj fbeA~ *^e^<ThA£d/t~
■ I V f ST QasA )CUJ^ T^e.. eluded &t&ie4 &vO>i il LU ? LOVO

Whether the court erred in declaring the federal law 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(4) and the Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.430(b) invalid