No. 22-5338
Chikosi Legins v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-1001 apprendi apprendi-rule criminal-law criminal-procedure evidence false-statement relevant-conduct sentencing sentencing-enhancement statutory-maximum sufficiency
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction under 18 U.S.C. 1001.
II. Whether the defendant was improperly subjected to an enhanced penalty of eight years in violation of Apprendi.
III. Whether the trial court erred in the sentencing of the defendant, both procedurally and substantively by using uncharged and unsupported relevant conduct.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction under 18 U.S.C. 1001
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-08-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 12, 2022)
Attorneys
Chikosi Legins
Charles Arthur Gavin — Deskevich, Gavin & Harris, P.C., Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent