No. 22-5336
Brian Scott Berryman v. Mississippi
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-provisions court-decisions criminal-law due-process federalism judicial-law legislative-intent public-interests standing statutory-construction
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. A STATE COURT hAS dECidEd aN ImportANt fEDeRAl quEstiON iN AWAY
that Conflicts with relEvANt decisions of this CouRt AND THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS HAT AFFECTSThE BROAD
PUbliC InTERESTS.
2. CONTRARY TO DECISIONS AND FAILS TO COMPORT TO PREUIOUS
DECISIONS OF THE STATE COURT OF APPEALS THAT AFFECTS
THE BROAD PUBLIC INTERESTS.
3. THE STATE SUPREME COURT, THROUGH VIOLENCE TO A
LEGISLATIVE ACT, BY STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION TO A STATUTE
DEEMED PAIN AND UNABIGUOUS CRAFTED JUDICIAL LAW
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the state court decision conflicts with relevant decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court and affects broad public interests
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-08
Reply of petitioner Brian Scott Berryman filed. (Distributed)
2022-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-10
Brief of respondent Mississippi in opposition filed.
2022-09-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 14, 2022.
2022-09-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 13, 2022 to November 14, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-09-13
Response Requested. (Due October 13, 2022)
2022-08-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-17
Waiver of right of respondent Mississippi to respond filed.
2022-06-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 12, 2022)
Attorneys
Brian Scott Berryman
Brian Scott Berryman — Petitioner
Mississippi
Allison Elizabeth Horne — Mississippi Attorney General's Office, Respondent