Federal Bureau of Investigation.

2) How can the petitoner be in two places at once, when proving he was already
Incarcerated in another county in the commisson of the crime. Where the petitioner
of the alleged crine adding he was out of state due to drivng trucks.

134 S.Ct. at 2473and Carpenter v U5, 138 5. Ct. 2206, which 18 a v1olation of
is illegal, where the petitioner qualifies.

4) How can the petitioner's hiranda rights be ignored through beirg
forged, where
the petitoner sent in his driviny license and signature proving he dd not sign
an miranda affidavit and his rights were vodlated is also nerits without a dbubt
and had requested an expert in this regard in this petiton andor any other.
huranda Ar120na, 384 Us 436,16 LEd2d 694,860 SCt 1602(196e6).

5) As to al records the pettioner asks, tf all records show and indcate proving, receiving
all dcunents from the FoFreedom of Information At statin the fact
an Appointnent Affidavit or Proof of Enuployment through the Us Departrent of
Justce,he ecor fund FoAEsoPoGRoe
on the court leaving grounds fr dismssal.

Did the 4th Circuit err in denying the petitioner's grounds for relief when the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated by agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation?