1. Whether digital personal literary property, which
a Defendant carries in the form of a post, com
ment, or tweet, is "other property " according to
M.G.L. Chapter 159 § 1.

2. Whether a 2022 social medium platform is a com
mon law common carrier.

3. Whether the public has a Constitutional right,
a) which guarantees non-discriminatory com
mon carriage,
b) which was long-established at the time the
original thirteen colonial states ratified the
US Constitution, and
c) which is confirmed by US Constitution
Amendment DC.

4. Whether Amendment I gives a 2022 social me
dium platform, which is unequivocally a message
common carrier, a Constitutional right to refuse
message common carriage of digital personal liter
ary property from any member of the public to any
member of the public.

5. Whether "hosting " (bailment) of digital personal
literary property in a backend server constitutes
speech of a 2022 social medium platform.

6. Whether it is allowable for a Court to use a logical
fallacy in interpretation of a statute.

7. Whether a 2022 social medium platform is a 1996
Interactive Computer Service (ICS) as an ICS is
defined in 47 U.S. Code § 230.

8. Whether the Internet
a) is a government-supported place of public
accommodation, in which a social medium
platform violates public accommodation anti-
discrimination law;
b) is a government-created government-supported
government-designated public forum, in
which a social medium platform violates
public forum doctrine by hosting a discrimi
natory open forum; or
c) contains government networks and facilities,
in which state action doctrine is violated by
discriminatory actions of a social medium
platform.

9. Whether the dismissal of the Petitioner 's Original
Complaint is an abuse of discretion.

All Questions Presented of Petition I1 are incorporated
by reference.

whether-digital-personal-literary-property-is-other-property