No. 22-530
Daniel A. Bench v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: child-witness confrontation confrontation-right court-martial plain-error prosecutorial-misconduct remote-testimony sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does a prosecutor's in-court lie to secure a witness's testimony constitute misconduct that materially prejudices an accused's Sixth Amendment right to confrontation or other substantial right?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a prosecutor's in-court lie to secure a witness's testimony constitute misconduct that materially prejudices an accused's' Sixth Amendment right to confrontation or other substantial right?
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-12-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 9, 2023)
2022-11-01
Application (22A365) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until December 7, 2022.
2022-10-31
Application (22A365) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 6, 2022 to December 7, 2022, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Daniel A. Bench
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent