No. 22-5297
Jean Max Darbouze v. California
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 8th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment deliberate-indifference due-process eighth-amendment fourteenth-amendment helling-v-mckinney state-application
Latest Conference:
2022-10-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
Amendment Constitutional ^The^R^spondent violated the Petitioner 8th
Rights.ALso applied tothe State California Via 14th Amendment
to the U.S.Constitution :
( 1993). Mckinney, 509 U.S. 25, 33 Helling V.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the respondent violated the petitioner's 8th Amendment constitutional rights, as applied to the State of California via the 14th Amendment
Docket Entries
2022-10-11
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
2022-06-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 6, 2022)
Attorneys
Jean Max Darbouze
Jean Max Darbouze — Petitioner