1) How might a court's attention be draun to merits without providing them escape routes?

2) Is construc tive denial oleounsel" allouable by imposing the Htobsoni's choice betmeen cleark representation?

3)a What is a fully correct s tatementollam inview of convoluted statates?

) Ar pathe juyinstuctn y Just because they are jpattern instuctions approredby the Stutes highes t court?

c) What is res geste"evidence and when and how is itallowed?

4) a) 2s faiture to disclose exculpatory andprtatie evidenee at the beginning and end of litigedon acce ptable? Be i t neglenee aron purpuse

3) How serious is laeking prohative evidenceand

5) Does a juede's subversive denialol flland fair opportunity to litigate overome unlaul am

G) Does totality o errors and circumstances collctivelyviodate substantineduepress

Whether the court erred in drawing an adverse inference against the petitioner