I. WhetherWAs the Courtof Appeal's decision
that Petitioner's trial Counsel told the jury
degree of murder was Suficient, is the
Petitioner entitled toA legitimate defense
theory Contrary to Glebe Frost, 574 U.S. (2014)?

II Whether was the Courtof Appeal's decision that the
Petitioner layered ineffectiveness assistance
USein StrcKlAndv.WAshington, 46GU.S.668(1984/And
MArtinez v.RyAn, 132S.Ct.1309(2o12)is the Petitioner
entitled toineffectiveness Assistance to over
Come procedurally defaulted?

III. WhetherWAs the Courtof AppeAl's decision
is the Petitioner entitled toan standard of
reviewonhisclaims?

Whether the trial court erred in denying the petitioner's legitimate defense theory