No. 22-5260

David Perez v. United States

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-08-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attempted-murder federal-sentencing racketeering-activity rico rico-sentencing sentencing state-law state-law-maximum statutory-interpretation statutory-maximum
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)

State sentencing law determines the statutory maximum sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 1963(a) for a RICO conviction based on a racketeering activity that is a state crime. Under Illinois state law for attempted murder, Mr. Perez could not receive a life sentence enhancement for his underlying RICO racketeering activity because he did not "personally discharg[e]" a firearm. Is a sentencing court bound by the state statutory maximum exposure for RICO violations based on state racketeering activities?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a sentencing court is bound by the state statutory maximum exposure for RICO violations based on state racketeering activities

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-07-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 2, 2022)

Attorneys

David Perez
Adam Clay StevensonUniversity of Wisconsin Law School, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent