I. WHETHER OR NOT THE EQUITABLE TOLLING, THE MAILBOX RULE ENTITLES PETITIONER FOR RELIEF WHEN THE SUPREME COURT, AS WELL AS THE LOWER COURTS ACCORD DEFENDANTS LEAVE TO SO UTILIZE.

II. WHETHER OR NOT A CRIMINAL DEFENDANT IS ENTITLED TO "COUNSEL OF CHOICE", AND DENYING A DEFENDANT SUCH A RIGHT INFRINGES UPON THE 6th AND 14th AMENDMENT GUARANTEE.

III. WHETHER OR NOT THE VOIR DIRE PROCEEDINGS COMES UNDER CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION AND WHEN JURORS CONDUCT SO TAINTED THE VOIR DIRE PROCEEDING AS TO DEPRIVE PETITIONER OF HIS RIGHT TO A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL TRIAL.

IV. WHETHER OR NOT THE 6th AND 14th AMENDMENT GUARANTEE PROTECTS AN ACCUSED AGAINST DEFICIENT PERFORMANCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL, RESULTING INTO PREJUDICE AGAINST PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS AND A FUNDAMENTAL FAIR TRIAL.

Whether the mailbox rule entitles petitioner for equitable tolling