No. 22-5219

Kim Lee Millbrook v. United States

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-07-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process first-amendment ineffective-assistance newly-discovered-evidence prosecutorial-misconduct standing takings
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether petitioner has a jurisdictional and standing to challenge 18 U.S.C. § 922 and 924, 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2), and 18 U.S.C. § 30 as an infringement upon powers reserved to the states.

Whether the trial court and Court of Appeals erred by affixing the district court judgment denying petitioner's habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and 6 to awaken violation ineffective assistance of counsel claim and actual innocence and miscarriage of justice claim and denial of Court of Appeals.

Whether petitioner had a jurisdictional challenge pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2), 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and 28 U.S.C. § 2253.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner has a valid claim under the First Amendment, due-process, standing, civil-rights, civil-procedure, takings

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-06-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 29, 2022)

Attorneys

Kim Lee Millbrook
Kim Lee Millbrook — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent