Ray Salazar v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
1. The question is: Did al Counsel ably Commabonal chan Assistance of Counsel Undertee SAM Htodeiont in tveir Guraveess of SelaZavs Mortal Heal isues Years Pri ty ic burt cle Mut Rul he importante For tively aud Slequatly al inwatigeton ie his atl ivory emt Monte bekie etal E
2. The question is: Did detel Counsls fender Constitetional Sips Mewadsuat Tor efile, Blstaate For Comels Gurareiess of Salazors Mental disoners but Wo Need than. thinly tequested cad olotadned & Covt= C0 Polslied Moura Wee Vey exert to ssist ay valuating, XOMiMInG te determing Selazars Com lr to.
Did the trial counsel's failure to timely and adequately conduct an investigation into Salazar's known mental health issues constitute ineffective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment?