No. 22-5196
Malik Holloway v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-law due-process federal-courthouse federal-courts mens-rea statutory-interpretation vagueness-doctrine void-for-vagueness weapon-possession
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Isn't 18 U.S.C. §930(e)(1) which criminalizes the mere possession in a federal courthouse of practically any item unconstitutionally vague?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. §930(e)(1) is unconstitutionally vague
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-07-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 26, 2022)
Attorneys
Malik Holloway
Steven Y. Yurowitz — Newman & Greenberg, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent