(1) Whether the district court abused its discretion when it denied Abdulrazzak's
motion to reopen (alter or amend) final judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b),
only reasoning the finality of the previous judgment.

(2) If the presiding judge's unfitness qualifies as the sort of "defect in the integrity of
the federal habeas proceeding", where the records reflect evidence that the district
judge patterns of ignorance and repeated judicial errors, about the laws controlling
procedural defaulted claims, Petitioner was entitled to new district judge.

whether-the-district-court-abused-its-discretion-in-denying-rule-60(b)-motion