Why is the Petitioner's charge of Ineffective Counsel against Attorney Newton Holiday not being addressed by any of the (lower) courts?

When will complete copies of the January 17, 2017 Hearing Transcripts be made available to the Petitioner? Hopefully, they will not be redacted or incomplete?

When will the Court provide the Petitioner's request for copies of BellSouth Telephone Records for Friday, May 18, (6:00 pm - 9.00 pm), Saturday and Sunday May 19, 20, 2012, from (9:00 am - 9:00 pm)? And a copy of the January 17, 2017 Hearing Transcript?

Why were the Petitioner's multiple letters, requesting copies of the January 17, 2017 Hearing Transcripts ignored?

Is there a check and balance for situations such as this?

How will the United States Supreme Court respond to the written comments submitted by Respondent, Senior Assistant Attorney General Michael M. Stahl, which is "... Specifically, Petitioner's (Vine) petition indicates that he had a post-conviction Hearing in 2017, see EFC No. page 105, however, No post-conviction record exist within the State Appellate Archives."

Please excuse the length of this question/statement by Senior Assistant Attorney General Michael M. Stahl, the petitioner felt that this statement is crucial to the Petitioner's argument.

The Petitioner holds that this requested information will validate that Attorney Newton Holiday perjured during his 'sworn ' testimony on January 17, 2017.

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions