1. Whether district courts may be required to use the inherently subjective and effectively unreviewable Johnson factors to determine common-fund fee awards despite Perdue's rejection of the Johnson-factors approach.

2. Whether district courts may be required to calculate common-fund attorney's fees only as a percentage of the fund, or may instead award fees based on the attorney's lodestar as is permitted by Courts of Appeals other than the Eleventh Circuit and the District of Columbia Circuit.

3. Whether the Court of Appeals may mandate that district courts adopt a 25% "benchmark" for percent-of-fund attorney's fee awards.

Whether district courts may be required to use the inherently subjective and effectively unreviewable Johnson factors to determine common-fund fee awards despite Perdue's rejection of the Johnson-factors approach