(1) Should the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit evaluating a 28 U.S.C. § 2244 Motion for authorization to file a Second or Successive Application under § 2254 be required to articulate the Court's grounds for its decision to either grant or deny authorization based on the law and facts of the case and documentary evidence, subject thereto under the criteria of § 2244?

(2) Does the Congressional enactment of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(E) prohibiting an appeal, rehearing, or certiorari review of the denial of a Motion for authorization under § 2244 by a United States Court of Appeals in the event of a Second or Successive Application under § 2254 violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution?

Should the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit be required to articulate the court's grounds for granting or denying authorization to file a second or successive application under § 2244(b)