No. 22-5161
Antonio M. Taylor v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3582 criminal-procedure district-court-discretion extraordinary-and-compelling-reasons extraordinary-circumstances retroactivity sentence-reduction sentencing-law statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a district court may consider nonretroactive changes in sentencing law in determining whether a defendant has shown "extraordinary and compelling reasons" for a sentence reduction as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court may consider nonretroactive changes in sentencing law in determining whether a defendant has shown 'extraordinary and compelling reasons' for a sentence reduction as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i)
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-07-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 22, 2022)
Attorneys
Antonio Taylor
Stephen Carl Moss — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent