Robert V. Wonsch v. Scott Crow, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections
1. May any State or Territory create, enact or enforce 2 any penal statute or constitutional
provision in CONTUMACY of the Sixth Amendment right to a Speedy Trial ?
2. What is the "time limit " of a Speedy Trial in a State 3 criminal proceeding? More so
when the state fails to have a time limit for a Speedy Trial 4.
3. The Petitioner is challenging the constitutionality of the State of Oklahoma 's penal
statute(s) and constitutional 5 provision(s) governing the time limits of Speedy
Trial, [from the filing of information to arraignment and trial], fTitle 22. Ch. 11 §
812.1 to 812.17: Title 22. Ch. 1 6 13 and Oklahoma Constitution. Article II $ 20*1.
4. "Is it constitutional for a State to confine a pre-trial detainee in solitary
confinement, [administrative segregation] for three (3) years, (1081 days)? All
because he invoked his constitutional right(s) to a speedy trial and demanded the
state 's discovery along with the refusal to sign the State 's volume(s) of plea offers ".
5. The Petitioner is challenging the CONSTITUTIONALITY of the Oklahoma Public
Defender 's7, POLICY AND PROCEDURE(s) 8.
6. The Petitioner is raising a question of constitutionality of whether a state may
conceal vital TRANSCRIPTS from criminal defendant(s) filing appellate review 9.
May-any-State-or-Territory-create-enact-or-enforce-any-penal-statute-or-constitutional-provision-in-CONTUMACY-of-the-Sixth-Amendment-right-to-a-Speedy-Trial