No. 22-5155
IFP
Tags: cage-v-louisiana cause-and-prejudice constitutional-review criminal-procedure habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel martinez-v-ryan out-of-time-appeal writ-of-appeal
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Whether the facts of Cockeiham and Petitioner Williams are exactly the same for purpose of out of time appeal and application of Cage to their conviction and sentence.
2) Whether petitioner has showed "caused and prejudice to obtain evidentiaiy hearing in Federal habeas court.
3) Whether 930,8 applies to petitioner claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in Martinez v. Ryan, 132 S. Ct. 1309,182 L. ed. 2D 272 (March 2012)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the facts of Cockerham and Petitioner Williams are exactly the same for purpose of out of time appeal and application of Cage to their conviction and sentence
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-04-07
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
Donald Williams
Donald L. Williams — Petitioner