No. 22-5152
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-conviction due-process equal-protection false-evidence fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus prosecutorial-misconduct sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2022-11-18
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER A TEMPORARY EXCEPTION EXISTS TO CITE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT'S UPLE HOLDING THAT A CRIMINAL CONVICTION USING USE OF FALSE EVIDENCE "MUST FREL" UNDER DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO CWE LATED KMSTHTES CONSTITUTE LON?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution is violated when a state knowingly uses false evidence to obtain a criminal conviction
Docket Entries
2022-11-21
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2022-11-02
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-18
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2022-10-03
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-07-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-05-17
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
In Re Jerry N. Alfred
Jerry Neil Alfred — Petitioner