THE U.S. SUPREME COURT HAS HELD.THAT A STATE LAW'S REVIVAL OF AN EXPIRED LIMITATION
PERIOD UNDER ITS STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS VIOLATES THE EX POST FACTO ARTICLE, AND A
COURT'S INTERPRETATION OF LAW IN A EX POST FACTO MANNER VIOLATES DUE PROCESS. IN
PETITIONER'S CASE, THE STATE OF MICHIGAN INTERPRETED ITS STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS TO
REVIVE AN EXPIRED OFFENSE. WAS PETITIONER'S 14TH AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS RIGHT
VIOLATED?

Whether the State of Michigan's interpretation of its statute of limitations to revive an expired offense violated the petitioner's 14th Amendment due process rights