1) Does the court believe that ' cheating', and violating established law/rules
must be addressed with an imposition of the clear penalties so listed?

2) Does the court impart ' equality ' as relates to self representation ?

3) When presented with overwhelming material evidence, does the court
abide by the standard ' of 'preponderance of evidence' to reach a decision.

4) Will the court decide the case based on merit, or give an advantage to
An established law firm or trillion dollar corporation?

5) In keeping with the rules of conciseness, brevity, and clarity, will the court
view ' meritorious ' submission which clearly shows the abundance of
favorable evidence of petitioner over respondent?

7 ) Petitioner has attended 532 depositions over a ten year period. Familiarity
with cases has shown no boundaries, with regard to violating rules by
certain attorneys. Will the court punish the offenders?

8) Can petitioner expect different and fair treatment in light of the
Abysmal actions of Judge Liman, Court of Appeals, and FINRA arbitration?

Does the court believe that 'cheating' and violating established law/rules must be addressed with an imposition of the clear penalties so listed?