QUESTION: ONE
WHETHER ADEFENDANT SUFFIUIENTLY ANDPROPERLY INVOKES
ENTITLEMENT TO QUALIFIED IMMUNITY DEFENSE INAQZU.S.L.S19B3
CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION LAWSUIT THRDUOH BROAD AND GENERAL ASSERTIONS DFENTITLEMENT.WHEN A PRO SE PRISONER SUBSTANTIALLY
MEETS IQBAL,IWOMBLY AND FED.R.CIU.P. .NA WHETHER THE
ISSUE KS ARGUABLE ON THE MERITS?
A) IFSO,DIA THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ERREGREGIOUSLY AS AMATTER
OF FACT AND LAW IN DENYING THE PETITIONERS MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO RRDCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL,AS "FRIVOLOUS" ANO"FAIL-
URE TOSTATE ACLAIM"?

QUESTION: TWO
WHEN A DISTAICT COURT CONCLUSORY ANA DENERALLY ANALIZES EACH
"TYPE"OFCLAIM IN A BUNDLE RATHERTHAN EACH "INDIVIDUAL CLAIM AS
A WHDLE" WITHOUT CONSIDERATION DF THE PLEADINGS iN FULL,AS VOULATIUE OF LQBAL AND IWOMBLY-DOES A APPELLATE LOURT ERR EGREGIOUSLY IN DENYING THE ISSUE WITMIN APPELLANTS MIFPA AS"FRIVOLOUS"
AND NOT ARGUABLE ON THE MERITS?
A IF SO,DID THE DISTRICT COUAT'S DECISIONREFLECT AN EXERCISE
OF OISCRETION WNDER Z8 U.S.C.S636LBJCI) AND FEA.R.CIU.P. 7ZLBIL)?

QUESTION: THREE
WHEN A DISTRICT COURT POST-HOL REVOKES INLORPORATIDN OF CLAIMS
APPEARINGWITHIN A PRIOR DEFECTIUE PLEAAING AFTER APPROUING THE
INCORPORATIDN IN A CURATIUE SECONAAMENAMENT -AT THE ELEVENTH
-HOUR AND SUBSEQUEWTLY REPEATEDLY REFUSES A CURATIVE AMENOMENT TO CORRECT THE TECHNICALITY,DOES A LOWER COURT COMMIT
REUERSIBLE ERRORIN LIDHT OFEOMAN,FED.R.CIUP. 1 ANA ISCA)?
A IF SO,DIDTHE FIFTH CIRCUIT ERREOREGIOUSLY IN DENYING
PETITIONER'S MIFPA AS "FRIVOLOUS" AND NOT "ARGUABLE ON THE MERITS'
ONTHIS ISSUE?

QUESTION: FOUR
WHETHER A PRISONER-PLAINIEFF MAY AMENO ACOMPLAINT TO CORRECT A
TECHNICALIJYNOTIFIED Z3-DANS PRIOR-ON THE OATE FINAL JUOGMENT
ISSUES ANDIOR VIA A FED.R.CVV.P. SALES BR GDCB) MOTION TO CORRECT A
MANIFEST ERRDR OF LAW THAT THE DISTRICT COURT OVERLOOKED REGARDING THE AMENOMENT?SOeDUSSOUYV.GULF COAST INU.CORP., BGOF.ZD S9Y
ETHCIR.19BT;LEISURE CAVIAR,LLCV US

Whether a defendant sufficiently and properly invokes a qualified immunity defense in a 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights action lawsuit through broad and general assertions of entitlement