Whether federal inmates who did not receive a meaningful opportunity to be heard on a substantial actual-innocence claim—because established circuit precedent stood firmly against them previously and they were not appointed counsel at their first opportunity to present the claim in a § 2255 motion—can show that the remedy by § 2255 motion was inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of their detention and thus proceed to a habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

Whether federal inmates who did not receive a meaningful opportunity to be heard on a substantial actual-innocence claim can show that the remedy by § 2255 motion was inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of their detention and thus proceed to a habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241