Whether the court of appeals violated the defendant's Fifth Amendment right to due process where the government presented evidence regarding just one type of methamphetamine (Ice), the district court found the defendant responsible for a different type of methamphetamine (methamphetamine (actual)), and the court of appeals affirmed the district court's finding based on its inaccurate conclusion that the government and the district court had referred to the two types of methamphetamine interchangeably.

Whether the court of appeals violated the defendant's Fifth Amendment right to due process