"Globally, as of 6:19pm CEST, 6 July 2022, there have been 548,990,094
confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 6,341,637 deaths, reported to WHO", Staff,
"WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard," WHO, https://covid19.who.int/
(accessed July 6, 2022), and, the present case rises on appeal, to raise assignments of
error, in an action brought, on petition for writ of mandamus, Fed.R.App.Pro. 21,
based upon facts alleged in complaint, triggering compulsory action by the Trial
Court under Fed.R.Crim.Pro.6(a), which provides, in relevant part, that, "[w]hen the
public interest so requires, the court must order that one or more grand juries be
summoned", and presenting the following questions:

1. Whether, upon presentment of a prima facie case, arising under the
Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, 18 U.S.C. §
248(a)(2), or, in the alternative, violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1512,
establishing a pattern of racketeering activity, beyond a reasonable
doubt, demonstrating "a clear and indisputable right to the requested
relief," In Re: Murphy-Brown, LLC, 907 F.3d 788 (4th Cir. 2018)
(internal quotation marks omitted), is entitled to issue of a writ of
mandamus, under Fed.R.App.Pro. 21, for the same. Order, In Re: Major
Mike Webb, Record No. 22-1422 (4th Cir. June 27, 2022).

2. Whether it is improper for a Court of Appeals to dismiss an action,
under Fed.R.App.Pro. 45, for failure to prosecute, where the Trial
Court, of record, has refused to issue a summons, pursuant to a duly
filed praecipe with the Trial Court to effect the same at the
commencement of the action, continuing a pattern demonstrated in
prior litigations presented by the same unrepresented litigant. Order,
Webb v. Fauci, Record No. 22-1627 (4th Cir. June 27, 2022).

Whether a prima facie case under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act or 18 U.S.C. § 1512 establishes a clear and indisputable right to a writ of mandamus