Question Presented (from Petition)
1- Plaintiff invoked the violation of the 14th amendment of the constitution of the
United States as to the fact that he was not served with a due process in the
proceedings at the trial court. Defendant was given more privileges than the
Plaintiff. (See the ruling on Plaintiff 's motion for default for failure to plead, filed
on 12/14/2020).
2- There are genuine issues to material facts that the trial's court denial and
granting of Defendant's motion for summary judgement is in conflict with
decisions rendered by the Appellate Court of the State of Connecticut.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the plaintiff's 14th-amendment-due-process rights were violated by the trial court's alleged unequal treatment of the parties
2022-12-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-25
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-11-25
Motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2022-10-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/10/2022.
2022-10-21
Petitioner complied with order of October 3, 2022.
2022-10-03
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 24, 2022, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2022-08-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-20
Waiver of right of respondent University of Connecticut to respond filed.
2022-06-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 12, 2022)