No. 22-5083
William Wellington Hooper, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process eighth-amendment fair-trial fourth-amendment search-and-seizure sentencing
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Were Mr. Hooper's cell phones seized in violation of his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure?
2. Did the District Court admit unreasonably prejudicial evidence, depriving Mr. Hooper of his Fifth and Sixth Amendment due process right to a fair trial by an impartial jury?
3. Were Counts 3 and 4 multiplicitous, in violation of Mr. Hooper's Fifth Amendment right against double jeopardy?
4. Is Mr. Hooper's sentence unreasonable and excessive, in violation of his rights under 18 USC § 3353(a) and the Eighth Amendment?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Were Mr. Hooper's cell phones seized in violation of his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure?
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-18
Waiver of right of respondent Office of the United States Attorney to respond filed.
2022-07-08
Attorneys
Mark Diamond
Mark Diamond — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Office of the United States Attorney
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent