No. 22-5082
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: burden-of-proof constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process jury-instructions reasonable-doubt winship
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the failure to instruct juries in criminal trials that the prosecution must prove each element of the charged crime beyond a reasonable doubt violate Winship?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the failure to instruct juries in criminal trials that the prosecution must prove each element of the charged crime beyond a reasonable doubt violate Winship?
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-19
Waiver of right of respondent People of the State of California to respond filed.
2022-07-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 12, 2022)
2022-04-26
Application (21A649) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 9, 2022.
2022-04-19
Application (21A649) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 10, 2022 to July 9, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Brian Gonzales
Mark Yanis — Petitioner
People of the State of California
David Andrew Wildman — CA Atty. Gene. Offfice, Respondent