No. 22-5074

Kurtis D. Worley v. Illinois

Lower Court: Illinois
Docketed: 2022-07-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment 5th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance plea-negotiations post-conviction-relief seizure settlements
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether Petitioners lost Conviction Petition

2. Whether Trial Counsel Rendered Ineffective Assistance of Counsel lhere he falled to advance the Argument that Petitioner Could Not thnowinsly and Intellisgently Walke his Miranda Rishts. Porsuant to Miranda-VsBecause of the severe inability to control his thaushts and actlors, Due to the Horicidal and Suicidal Ideations Cansed by Depressed Reaction of his Aiagnosed Mod Disordar

3. Whether Petitioners Due Process of Law was Violate by Detectives Garafolo and Khaechler, where Detectines "Illesaly"seied Petitiones statements while in a Psychot State" Violating Pettioners "Gand 14th Amendmants. by the Trial Co By alow eors Illesally Seized statement as admissable.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether petitioner's due process of law was violated by detectives' illegal seizure of petitioner's settlements while in public, violating petitioner's 4th and 5th Amendment rights

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-09
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2022-06-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 11, 2022)

Attorneys

Illinois
Katherine Marie DoerschOffice of the Illinois Attorney General, Respondent
Kurtis D. Worley
Kurtis D. Worley — Petitioner