WHETHER THE COURT BELOW ERRED IN CONCLUDING PETITIONER WAS NOT DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL AT TRIAL WHEN HIS TRIAL COUNSEL IN A SWORN AFFIDAVIT ATTACHED TO HIS STATE WRIT ADMITTED THAT HE/SHE WAS INEFFECTIVE BY NOT PROPERLY REPRESENTING PETITIONER?

1. WHAT AMOUNT OF CREDIBILITY DOES A COURT OWE TO AN ATTORNEY WHO SELF-ADMITS THAT HE RENDERED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE WHEN REPRESENTING HIS OR HER CLIENT AT TRIAL?

2. WHETHER IN A WRIT PROCEEDING A COURT SHOULD RESOLVE A CLAIM OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL IN FAVOR OF A PETITIONER WHEN THE ATTORNEY ADMITS UNDER OATH THAT HIS OR HER REPRESENTATION OF HIS CLIENT FELL BELOW AN OBJECTIVE STANDARD OF REASONABLE ASSISTANCE THAT WAS BOTH DEFICIENT AND PREJUDICIAL?

3. WHETHER A CONVICTION SHOULD BE SET-ASIDE WHEN A TRIAL JUDGE MAKES PREJUDICIAL REMARKS THAT SHOWS HIS BIAS AGAINST THE DEFENDANT THEN DURING THE HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDINGS THE SAME JUDGE RECUSES HIMSELF AFTER THE HABEAS ATTORNEY FILES A MOTION TO RECUSE BASED ON THE SAME STATE MENTS HE MADE AT TRIAL?

4.

Whether petitioner was denied Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel