1. Whether Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019), renders invalid the imposition of Petitioner's sentencing enhancement for possession of a firearm during commission of a drug trafficking offense, under U.S.S.G. Manual §2D1.1(b)(1), and/or, whether a change in statutory interpretation that does affect the sentencing Guidelines implicates the safety-valve clause of § 2255.

2. Whether a Habeas Corpus statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2241 grants district courts authority to review a claim that Petitioner's sentence is invalid, when current precedent foreclosed the claim at the time of Petitioner's prior Habeas Corpus motion, but an intervening Supreme Court precedent changed the construction of the statute and the new statutory interpretation applies retroactively.

Whether Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019), renders invalid the imposition of Petitioner's sentencing enhancement for possession of a firearm during commission of a drug trafficking offense, under U.S.S.G. Manual § 2D1.1(b)(1), and/or, whether a change in statutory interpretation that does affect the sentencing Guidelines implicates the safety-valve clause of § 2255