No. 22-5044

Richard Anthony Siler v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-07-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability civil-rights consumer-protection data-protection direct-appeal due-process frivolous-claims habeas-corpus judicial-procedure privacy standing writ-of-certiorari
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Is it legal for a legitimate leads company to sell personal identities under any circumstance?

2. Are juries entitled to factual answers once asking questions during deliberations concerning the core issue of the instant case?

3. Are issuances of a Certificate of Appealability (COA) to be considered proof that a particular issue is not frivolous?

4. Can a petitioner's claims be considered all frivolous after error has been determined by the courts during Direct Appeal?

5. Is the court legally bound under Clisby to answer all claims from a petitioner, even if one of the claims may have been covered while answering another claim?.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is it legal for a legitimate leads company to sell personal identities under any circumstance?

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-07-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 5, 2022)

Attorneys

Richard Anthony Siler
Richard Anthony Siler — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent