No. 22-5033

Curtis Chewning v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2022-07-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: charging-information court-fraud due-process fraud jury jury-trial reasonable-doubt sentencing unlawful-seizure
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)

Question (1)
WHETHER DUE PROCESS OF LAW IS VIOLATED WHERE A SENTENCE IS
INCREASED BASED UPON FACTS NOT INHERENT IN THE CHARGING
INFORMATION OR PROVEN BY A JURY BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT?

Question (2)
WHETHER AN UNLAWFUL SEIZURE HAS OCCURRED WHERE A STATE
IMPRISONS A CITIZEN LONGER THAN THA T WHICH IS PERMITTED BY LAW AS A
RESULT OF FRAUD BEING COMMITTED UPON A COURT?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether due process is violated by sentence increase based on facts not proven to jury

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-08
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2022-06-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 4, 2022)

Attorneys

Curtis Chewning
Curtis Chewning — Petitioner
Florida
Carla Suzanne BechardOffice of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Respondent