No. 22-5027
IFP
Tags: confrontation-clause constitutional-protections constitutional-review criminal-procedure due-process jackson-v-virginia out-of-court-statements sufficiency-of-evidence
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Wheather the due process standard recognized in Jackson v.
Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) constitutionally protects an
accused against out-of-court statements in violation
Confrontation Clause during a sufficiency of evidence review?of the
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the due process standard recognized in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) constitutionally protects an accused against out-of-court statements in violation of the Confrontation Clause during a sufficiency of evidence review?
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 4, 2022)
Attorneys
Justin D. Bennett
Justin D. Bennett — Petitioner