David M. Greco v. Matthew J. Platkin, Attorney General of New Jersey, et al.
1. Whether the fact that the challenged portions of
New Jersey's ERPO Act are "... flagrantly and
patently violative ..." of the Fourth Amendment to
the United States Constitution bars the Federal
Courts, as a matter of fact and law, from abstaining
under Younger?
2. Whether the District Court and Third Circuit
incorrectly applied this Court's precedents in
Younger and the limited extension of that doctrine
to related civil, quasi-criminal and administrative
cases pending in state court and wrongfully and
inappropriately abstained?
3. Whether the New Jersey Attorney General's "Memo
Fix" is a remedy that violates the rule in United
States v. Stevens, 559 U.S. 460 (2010)?
Whether the fact that the challenged portions of New Jersey's ERPO Act are flagrantly and patently violative of the Fourth Amendment bars the Federal Courts from abstaining under Younger