No. 22-460
Joshua C. Plumb, et al. v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al.
Relisted (2)
Tags: adverse-parties civil-procedure due-process foreclosure fourteenth-amendment judicial-foreclosure judicial-power pro-se-defendants standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-03-24
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment limits the judicial power of state courts to issuing judgments deciding those justiciable matters which exist between adverse parties.
2. Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prevented Washington's appellate court judges from requiring defendants to disprove plaintiffs standing.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment limits the judicial power of state courts to issuing judgments deciding those justiciable matters which exist between adverse parties
Docket Entries
2023-03-27
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-03-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
2023-02-16
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-01-23
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/20/2023.
2022-11-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 19, 2022)
2022-08-30
Application (22A187) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until November 5, 2022.
2022-08-25
Application (22A187) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 6, 2022 to November 5, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Joshua Plumb, et al.
Scott Erik Stafne — Stafne Law Advocacy and Consulting, Petitioner