No. 22-459

Ohio v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2022-11-15
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
CVSGAmici (4)Relisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: federal-railroad-safety-act grade-crossing grade-crossing-statute interstate-commerce interstate-commerce-commission-termination-act preemption railroad-preemption railroad-safety state-regulation transportation transportation-law
Latest Conference: 2024-01-05 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Ohio's "Blocked Crossing Statute," Ohio Rev. Code
§5589.21, prohibits stopped trains from blocking public roads for longer than five minutes, with certain exceptions. No federal law addresses how long stopped
trains may block a grade crossing. But two acts of
Congress address when federal law preempts state
laws related to railroads. The first is the Interstate
Commerce Commission Termination Act. The Act
grants the Surface Transportation Board "exclusive"
jurisdiction over railroad "transportation." 49 U.S.C.
§10501(b). The second is the Federal Railroad Safety
Act, which expressly permits States to enforce laws
"related to railroad safety" until "the Secretary of
Transportation ... prescribes a regulation or issues an
order covering the subject matter of the State requirement." 49 U.S.C. §20106(a)(2).

This case presents two overlapping questions:

1. Does 49 U.S.C. §101501(b) preempt state laws
that regulate the amount of time a stopped train may
block a grade crossing?

2. Does 49 U.S.C. §20106(a)(2) save from preemption state laws that regulate the amount of time a
stopped train may block a grade crossing?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does 49 U.S.C. §101501(b) preempt state laws that regulate the amount of time a stopped train may block a grade crossing?

Docket Entries

2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-04
2023-11-21
Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
2023-03-20
The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
2023-03-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-23
Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner.
2023-02-23
2023-02-16
2023-01-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 16, 2023.
2023-01-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 17, 2023 to February 16, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-12-15
2022-12-15
2022-12-12
Brief amici curiae of Sheet Metal, Air Railr Transportaion Workers, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, Academy of Rail Labor Attorneys filed.
2022-12-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 17, 2023. See Rule 30.1.
2022-12-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 15, 2022 to January 16, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-11-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 15, 2022)

Attorneys

CSX Transportation, Inc.
Andrew TauberWinston & Strawn LLP, Respondent
Ohio
Michael Jason HendershotOhio Attorney General's Office, Petitioner
Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association
Michael Thomas Gmoser — Amicus
Sheet Metal, Air Railr Transportaion Workers, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, Academy of Rail Labor Attorneys
Lawrence Moses MannAlper & Mann, PC, Amicus
States of Indiana, Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia
James Allen BartaOffice of the Indiana Attorney General, Amicus
Thomas M. FisherOffice of the Indiana Attorney General, Amicus
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Amicus