No. 22-450
Gregory Shields, Sr. v. Kentucky
Tags: confrontation-clause constitutional-standard crawford-v-washington cross-examination due-process preliminary-hearing state-court-division state-court-split witness-testimony
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure
CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2023-03-03
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
When, if ever, does a preliminary hearing provide an "adequate opportunity" for cross-examination under the Confrontation Clause?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When, if ever, does a preliminary hearing provide an 'adequate opportunity' for cross-examination under the Confrontation Clause?
Docket Entries
2023-03-06
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/3/2023.
2023-02-15
Reply of petitioner Gregory Shields filed. (Distributed)
2023-01-26
Brief of respondent Kentucky in opposition filed.
2022-12-27
Response Requested. (Due January 26, 2023)
2022-12-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-15
Brief amicus curiae of Richard D. Friedman filed.
2022-12-15
Brief amicus curiae of Rutherford Institute filed.
2022-12-15
Brief amicus curiae of VanHo Law filed.
2022-12-14
Waiver of right of respondent Kentucky to respond filed.
2022-11-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 15, 2022)
2022-09-06
Application (22A198) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until November 11, 2022.
2022-08-30
Application (22A198) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 14, 2022 to November 11, 2022, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Gregory Shields
Jonathan Yates Ellis — McGuireWoods LLP, Petitioner
Kentucky
Matthew Franklin Kuhn — Office of Attorney General of Kentucky, Respondent
Richard D. Friedman
Richard D. Friedman — Amicus
Rutherford Institute
Steven Andrew Engel — Dechert LLP, Amicus
VanHo Law
Adam Michael Van Ho — VanHo Law, Amicus