No. 22-431

Gigi Jordan v. Amy Lamanna, Superintendent, Bedford Hills Correctional Facility

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2022-11-08
Status: Dismissed
Type: Paid
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: clearly-established federal-law habeas-corpus public-trial-clause sixth-amendment supreme-court-precedent unreasonable-application
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-02-24 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

The question presented is whether a federal habeas petitioner seeking relief on the basis of a violation of the Public Trial Clause can demonstrate an "unreasonable application of clearly established Federal law" within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1) in the absence of a Supreme Court precedent involving analytically indistinguishable facts.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a federal habeas petitioner seeking relief on the basis of a violation of the Public Trial Clause can demonstrate an 'unreasonable application of clearly established Federal law' within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1) in the absence of a Supreme Court precedent involving analytically indistinguishable facts

Docket Entries

2023-02-27
Petition dismissed as moot.
2023-02-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2023-01-10
Suggestions of death and mootness filed by counsel for petitioner.
2022-12-29
Application (22A551) denied by Justice Sotomayor. Upon further consideration of the application of counsel for the applicant, the response, and the reply filed thereto, it is ordered that the stay heretofore issued by the undersigned on December 20, 2022, be, and the same is hereby, vacated. The application is, in all respects, denied.
2022-12-28
Reply of applicant Gigi Jordan filed.
2022-12-27
Response to application from respondent Amy Lamanna filed.
2022-12-21
Response Requested. (Due January 20, 2023)
2022-12-20
2022-12-20
Upon consideration of the application of counsel for the applicant, it is ordered that the December 19, 2022 order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, case No. 20-3317, is hereby stayed pending further order of Justice Sotomayor or of the Court. It is further ordered that a response to the application be filed on or before Tuesday, December 27, 2022, by 4 p.m. (EST).
2022-12-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-07
Waiver of right of respondent Amy Lamanna to respond filed.
2022-11-04
2022-07-20
Application (22A38) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until November 4, 2022.
2022-07-14
Application (22A38) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 7, 2022 to November 4, 2022, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.

Attorneys

Amy Lamanna
Steven Chiajon WuNew York County District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Gigi Jordan
Michael B. KimberlyMcDermott Will & Emery LLP, Petitioner