(1) Whether the federal wire fraud statute criminalizes any "implied misrepresentation" that induces another to enter into a financial transaction, even when the alleged misrepresentation relates to a fact extrinsic to the essential elements of the bargain, a question that this Court likely will address in Ciminelli v. United States, No. 21-1170.

(2) Whether the Speedy Trial Act allows a district court to enter a retroactive "ends-of-justice" exclusion of time based on after-the-fact "ends-of-justice" findings, to "cure" a Speedy Trial Act violation that already has occurred.

Whether the federal wire fraud statute criminalizes any 'implied misrepresentation' that induces another to enter into a financial transaction, even when the alleged misrepresentation relates to a fact extrinsic to the essential elements of the bargain