Did Petitioner satisfy the burden for the issuance of a certificate of appealability on his ineffective assistance of counsel claims where his trial attorney failed to (1) object when the prosecutor argued in rebuttal that Brown's injuries were consistent with him being the driver, where no evidence supported that argument; (2) offer evidence that corroborated the proposed testimony of a key witness, where the trial court excluded her testimony based on the lack of assurances of reliability; and (3) retain an accident reconstruction expert for trial, where a post-conviction accident reconstruction showed that Brown was not the driver?

Did Petitioner satisfy the burden for the issuance of a certificate of appealability on his ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims