Mary Corner v. Martin J. Walsh, Secretary of Labor
1. Whether my rights to procedural due process was violated under the XIV Amendment when I was denied my right to submit a Reply Brief in 7th Circuit Appeals Court?
2. Whether under 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A), only the statement of reasons is considered as the administrative record.
3. Whether the district court and/or 7th Circuit Appeals Court can award the Secretary of Labor cost to be paid by a complaining union member.
4. Whether my rights under LMRDA § 402(b) was violated when the Secretary of Labor refused to investigate my complaint regarding retired candidate dues not being on the unions LM-2
5. Whether the 7th Circuit Appeals Court can place a $2000 fine on a complaining union member as a deterrent under the Labor Management Reporting And Disclosure Act, as Amended, 1959 and called it a fine for a frivolous complaint.
6. Whether my rights was violated under the Eighth Amendment when I was charged $2000 for exercising my rights under the Labor Management Reporting And Disclosure Act, as Amended, 1959.
7. whether or not the Secretary should have investigated the NATIONAL APWU STATEMENT. The APWU does not consider Corner's September 29, 2020 complaint to be timely or proper before Secretary of Labor because her allegations were not properly protested and or appealed to the NEAC. This was part of my complaint.
Whether my rights to procedural due process was violated under the XIV Amendment