No. 22-317

Jay Nygard, et ux. v. City of Orono, Minnesota

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-10-05
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: circuit-split civil-rights constitutional-challenge criminal-enforcement due-process facial-challenge municipal-ordinance pre-enforcement pre-enforcement-challenge vagueness void-for-vagueness
Latest Conference: 2022-11-18
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Can a homeowner prevail on a Papachristou-based pre-enforcement challenge to a municipal permitting law?

2. Can a criminally enforceable city ordinance be challenged as unconstitutionally vague outside a First Amendment claim?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can a homeowner prevail on a Papachristou-based pre-enforcement challenge to a municipal permitting law?

Docket Entries

2022-11-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-21
Waiver of right of respondent City of Orono, a Minnesota Municipality to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2022-10-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 4, 2022)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of ServiceProof of ServicePetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

City of Orono, a Minnesota Municipality
John S. Brooksbank — Campbell Knutson, P.A., Respondent
Jay Nygard, et ux.
Erick G. Kaardal — Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson P.A., Petitioner