No. 22-31
Arizona v. Brian Mecinas, et al.
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: appellate-procedure article-iii-standing civil-procedure intervention mootness munsingwear-doctrine political-question standing vacatur
Latest Conference:
2022-12-09
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the motion to intervene was timely.
2. Whether the opinion below should be vacated as moot under Munsingwear.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the motion to intervene was timely
Docket Entries
2022-12-12
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/9/2022.
2022-11-21
Reply of petitioner Arizona filed. (Distributed)
2022-11-07
Brief of respondent Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs in opposition filed.
2022-10-07
Response Requested. (Due November 7, 2022)
2022-09-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/14/2022.
2022-09-26
Reply of petitioner Arizona filed. (Distributed)
2022-09-12
Waiver of right of respondent Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs to respond filed.
2022-09-12
Brief of respondents Brian Mecinas, et al. in opposition filed.
2022-08-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 12, 2022, for all respondents.
2022-08-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 11, 2022 to September 12, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-07-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 11, 2022)
Attorneys
Arizona
Mark C. Dangerfield — Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A., Petitioner
Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs
Jessica Ring Amunson — Jenner & Block LLP, Respondent
Brian Mecinas, et al.
Abha Khanna — Elias Law Group LLP, Respondent